Not automatically. The designation supports the accounting tasks it was earned to perform, such as financial reporting, audit, or tax work; broader business consulting is a separate category of work that needs its own assessment. A mixed role has to be reviewed task by task rather than credentialed as a whole.
Assess the designation against specific tasks, not the job as a whole
Ask which of the offered duties the designation was actually earned and licensed to cover, and treat any advisory or strategy work outside that scope as a separate question. This matters most when the consulting component is substantial, since a role that is mostly non-accounting advisory work may not read as accounting work regardless of who is performing it. Get specific about which tasks qualify before assuming the whole position does.
Three conditions sit behind that analysis and are worth naming, because a mixed role can satisfy the profession question and still fail on one of them. The work must be prearranged with a U.S. employer rather than sought after arrival.
It must be temporary in purpose, which is a statement about the intended engagement rather than about how long anyone hopes to stay. And it cannot be structured as self-employment, so an arrangement in which the applicant invoices through a company they own, with no genuine separate employer, is outside the category however the duties are described. A mixed offer is where the third of these quietly goes wrong, since consulting work is often organised through the consultant's own entity by habit.
Hypothetical example: a management accountant engaged by a performing-arts organisation finds the advisory portion was to be invoiced through their own corporation, which changes the structure question before the duty question is even reached.