No. A title like 'engineer' does not establish eligibility on its own; the profession requires actual duties and credentials to match the specific engineering category recognized under USMCA. A title chosen for internal or marketing reasons can diverge from what the role really involves, so duties and credentials need independent confirmation.
Look past the title to the underlying work
Ask for specifics: what portion of the week is spent on technical design or analysis versus meetings, sales support, or people management. A role that is mostly coordination with occasional technical input reads differently than one built around sustained engineering work. This distinction matters because the profession's requirements attach to the substance of the job, and a title mismatch discovered after filing is far harder to correct than one caught early.
Two further conditions belong on the same page. TN authorization attaches to a particular employer and the position described, so a change of employer, or a material change in duties after admission, is a fresh question rather than an internal personnel matter, and it is better raised before it happens than afterwards. The category also contemplates temporary professional work for a prearranged employer: an applicant intending to work for themselves, or through a company they control where no genuine separate employer relationship exists, falls outside it however well the profession otherwise fits.
Hypothetical example: a marine engineer receives an offer titled fleet operations engineer, and the reviewer finds roughly half the described week is vessel scheduling rather than engineering work, which is the fact that decides whether the profession match survives.